NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 2190 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3471x more texture fill rate: 311.0 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 4352 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 474.547 vs 67.802
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.736 vs 81.68
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1830.143 vs 370.179
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 7 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 2190 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4352 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 vs 67.802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 vs 81.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 vs 370.179 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129915 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22739 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2913 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 | 67.802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 | 81.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 | 370.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 1230.769 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | AD106 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 2023 | 7 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 72 | 577 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 2190 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 330.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4352 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 155.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 240.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
