NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

3.1x more core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 735 MHz
Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1815 MHz
3.3x more texture fill rate: 480.2 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1166 vs 493
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26959 vs 9765
3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 168049 vs 56688
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 417.133 vs 202.984
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 55.476 vs 16.498
Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 245.639 vs 151.433
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2459.317 vs 729.947

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	2310 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz vs 1815 MHz
Texture fill rate	480.2 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines	5888 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 8 nm
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1166 vs 493
PassMark - G3D Mark	26959 vs 9765
Geekbench - OpenCL	168049 vs 56688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	417.133 vs 202.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	55.476 vs 16.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	245.639 vs 151.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2459.317 vs 729.947

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

3x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 285 Watt
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt vs 285 Watt
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1166

493

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

26959

9765

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

168049

56688

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

417.133

202.984

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

55.476

16.498

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

245.639

151.433

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2459.317

729.947

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070	NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark	1166	493
PassMark - G3D Mark	26959	9765
Geekbench - OpenCL	168049	56688
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	417.133	202.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	55.476	16.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	245.639	151.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2459.317	729.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2138.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		12750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		12750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3355

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070	NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Code name	AD104	GA106
Launch date	2023
Place in performance rating	35	272
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz	1815 MHz
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	735 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	480.2 GFLOPS (1:64)	145.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	30.74 TFLOPS (1:1)	9.293 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	30.74 TFLOPS	9.293 TFLOPS
Pipelines	5888	2560
Pixel fill rate	167.0 GPixel/s	87.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	480.2 GTexel/s	145.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	285 Watt	95 Watt
Transistor count	35800 million	13250 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Height	61 mm, 2.4 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	336 mm, 13.2 inches
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None
Width	140 mm, 5.5 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	504.2 GB/s	192 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6