NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 386.3 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Around 26% higher pipelines: 7424 vs 5888
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25045 vs 22294
- Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4179 vs 3161
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160742 vs 123479
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 7424 vs 5888 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 220 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25045 vs 22294 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4179 vs 3161 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160742 vs 123479 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 997 vs 935
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 997 vs 935 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 | 997 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25045 | 22294 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4179 | 3161 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160742 | 123479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD104 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 46 | 43 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 386.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 24.72 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 7424 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
| Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700 XT
