NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 16214.6x more texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- 25.3x more pipelines: 9728 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 982 vs 349
- 18.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27374 vs 1469
- 9.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4911 vs 513
- 42.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 180351 vs 4271
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 29 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 9728 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 vs 349 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 vs 1469 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 vs 513 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 vs 4271 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 | 349 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 | 1469 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 | 513 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
Code name | AD103 | GK107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 29 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 39 | 1270 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
Price now | $94.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 993 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 9728 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |