NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 982 vs 705
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27374 vs 15652
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 180351 vs 105171
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 vs 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 vs 15652 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 vs 105171 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 4911
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 vs 4911 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 | 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 | 15652 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 | 10685 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 | 105171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD103 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 13 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 39 | 138 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 9728 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
