NVIDIA T400 4GB vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 15.8x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 19.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 580 Watt
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 3 September 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 384
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 vs 384 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 652 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3758 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17217 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Grenada |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 3 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 257 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 4x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |