NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs AMD Radeon R7 M465X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and AMD Radeon R7 M465X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- 5790.5x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 4.9x more pipelines: 2496 vs 512
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4680 vs 1787
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 512 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4680 vs 1787 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M465X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 824 MHz
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 280
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M465X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | AMD Radeon R7 M465X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 280 | 374 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4680 | 1787 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | AMD Radeon R7 M465X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK210 | Tropo |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 374 | 390 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |