NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 3% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2496
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 374
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10128 vs 5852
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2496 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 vs 374 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10128 vs 5852 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 497 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 | 10128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5443 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | GK210 | GA106 |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 11 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 256 | 259 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2496 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 12000 million |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |