NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 315 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 23 Watt
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 300 vs 213
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 49

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 1210 MHz vs 523 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
• Around 16% better floating-point performance: 116.16 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
• 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6433 vs 882
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1860 vs 1382
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1860 vs 1382

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	300 213
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	179 49
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	882 6433
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 1860

Compare specifications (specs)