NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 315 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 23 Watt
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 172
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 942 vs 719
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1382 vs 690
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 942 vs 719
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1382 vs 690

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 523 MHz
• Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 6.7 billion / sec vs 4.184 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 521 vs 318
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1875 vs 882
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.184 vs 3.025
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 172.058 vs 79.479
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.459 vs 0.217
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.145 vs 4.705
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.944 vs 6.573
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 859 vs 465
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 859 vs 465

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 521
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	180 172
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	882 1875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.025 4.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.479 172.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.217 0.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.705 8.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.573 13.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465 859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465 859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 690

Compare specifications (specs)