NVIDIA P104-100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P104-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P104-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 924 MHz
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 83.04 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 2,657 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51497 vs 19018
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 vs 7 October 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 924 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 83.04 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 2,657 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 vs 19018 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 387 vs 123
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5725 vs 3707
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 387 vs 123 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5725 vs 3707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P104-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P104-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51497 | 19018 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 123 | 387 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3707 | 5725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P104-100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM204 |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 | 7 October 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 557 | 558 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | |
Price now | $1,899 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 924 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 2,657 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 83.04 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | 120 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |