NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon RX 480

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon RX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1120 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• 754.3x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7000 MHz
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 103.851
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 769.541
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 7.593
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 vs 67.879
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 11172
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 11172

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480

• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
• Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 vs 6724
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 251
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 vs 36174
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 vs 448.036
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1680
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1680
• Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 966 vs 899

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 480

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6724 8578
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	251 774
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36174 39538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 103.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 769.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 7.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 67.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 597.772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 11172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	899 966

Compare specifications (specs)