NVIDIA P106-100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1020 MHz
  • Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1085 MHz
  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
  • 3.1x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
  • 1601.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
  • Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6724 vs 3901
  • 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36174 vs 11526
  • 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 42.463
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 642.715
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 2.933
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.32 vs 26.532
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 133.458
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 4843
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 4843
  • 7.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 899 vs 117
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 19 June 2017 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed 1506 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed 1709 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate 136.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 640
Floating-point performance 4,375 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6724 vs 3901
Geekbench - OpenCL 36174 vs 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 163.993 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1705.321 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.266 vs 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 76.32 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 448.036 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12824 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12824 vs 4843
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 899 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 251
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1860
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1680
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1860
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1680
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 521 vs 251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3683 vs 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3683 vs 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6724
3901
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
251
521
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
36174
11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
163.993
42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1705.321
642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9.266
2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
76.32
26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
448.036
133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12824
4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1860
3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1680
3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12824
4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1860
3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1680
3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
899
117
Name NVIDIA P106-100 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark 6724 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark 251 521
Geekbench - OpenCL 36174 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 163.993 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1705.321 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.266 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 76.32 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 448.036 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12824 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1860 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1680 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12824 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1860 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1680 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 899 117

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA P106-100 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell
Code name GP106 GM107
Launch date 19 June 2017 18 February 2014
Place in performance rating 439 707
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Price now $299.01
Value for money (0-100) 15.02

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1709 MHz 1085 MHz
Core clock speed 1506 MHz 1020 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,375 gflops 1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1280 640
Texture fill rate 136.7 GTexel / s 43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 4,400 million 1,870 million
CUDA cores 640

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 250 mm 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.2 GB / s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz 5.4 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA