NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 108 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.229 vs 9.373

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
• 4.2x more pipelines: 800 vs 192
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• Around 85% higher memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 2600 MHz
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1345 vs 947
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 335 vs 303
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 3879
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 459.025 vs 258.26
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.906 vs 0.885
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.022 vs 13.688
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.793 vs 19.02
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 vs 1600
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2673 vs 1682
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2799 vs 2668
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 vs 1600
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2673 vs 1682
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2799 vs 2668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	947 1345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	303 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3879 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.229 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	258.26 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.885 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.688 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.02 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1600 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1682 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2668 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1600 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1682 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2668 2799

Compare specifications (specs)