NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 4000M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 75% higher pipelines: 336 vs 192
Around 38% better floating-point performance: 638.4 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1302 vs 979
4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 vs 68

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 February 2011 vs 11 November 2008
Pipelines	336 vs 192
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1302 vs 979
PassMark - G2D Mark	273 vs 68

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Around 27% higher core clock speed: 602 MHz vs 475 MHz
Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 26.6 GTexel / s
2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 5212
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1254
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1254

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	602 MHz vs 475 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.5 GTexel / s vs 26.6 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	15302 vs 5212
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 1254

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1302

979

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

273

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5212

15302

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

3358

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
PassMark - G3D Mark	1302	979
PassMark - G2D Mark	273	68
Geekbench - OpenCL	5212	15302
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1254	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1254	3358

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GF104	GT200B
Launch date	22 February 2011	11 November 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	$1,799
Place in performance rating	1302	1303
Price now	$111.99	$149.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	19.30	8.67
Technical info
Core clock speed	475 MHz	602 MHz
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops	462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	336	192
Texture fill rate	26.6 GTexel / s	38.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	1,950 million	1,400 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1536 MB
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB / s	76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0