NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 6000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 448 vs 96
- 6.4x better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 160 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 87% higher memory clock speed: 2988 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2691 vs 467
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 449 vs 365
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 1820
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 1820
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 December 2010 vs 23 February 2008 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops vs 160 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2691 vs 467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 449 vs 365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 204 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2691 | 467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 449 | 365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9850 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.66 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.839 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3501 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3501 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 1820 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF100 | G92 |
Launch date | 10 December 2010 | 23 February 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,399 | |
Place in performance rating | 780 | 783 |
Price now | $332.21 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | 160 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | 70 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |