NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 530 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 2.2 GTexel / s vs 2.12 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 22.4 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 93 vs 70
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 334 vs 168
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2.2 GTexel / s vs 2.12 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 93 vs 70 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 vs 168 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 93 | 70 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 | 168 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G98 |
Launch date | 15 August 2008 | 15 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 1008 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 2.2 GTexel / s | 2.12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | MXM-I |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |