NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- 11.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 334 vs 28
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 vs 28 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 580 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 4.64 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 23.2 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 136 vs 93
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 580 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.64 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 23.2 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 vs 93 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 93 | 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 | 28 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 784 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G98 |
Launch date | 15 August 2008 | 15 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 1673 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 580 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 23.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 2.2 GTexel / s | 4.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | MXM-I |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |