NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs ATI Radeon 7200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M and ATI Radeon 7200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 143 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 180 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 32 MB
- 14x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 143 MHz
- 195.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 586 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 1 June 2000 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 32 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 586 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 7200
- 23.1x more texture fill rate: 996 MTexel / s vs 43.2 GTexel / s
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 46
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 996 MTexel / s vs 43.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 vs 46 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 7200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | ATI Radeon 7200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 586 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 | 94 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | ATI Radeon 7200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 6 |
Code name | G92 | R100 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 1 June 2000 |
Place in performance rating | 1408 | 1411 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 143 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s | 996 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 30 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 5.31 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 143 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |