NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 44
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3272
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3272

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
• Around 67% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 581 vs 538

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	538 581
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	150 44
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3272

Compare specifications (specs)