NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and ATI Radeon HD 4250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 594 MHz
- 15.1x more texture fill rate: 35.97 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s
- 12.8x more pipelines: 512 vs 40
- 24.2x better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 47.52 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 792 MHz
- 23.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2943 vs 123
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 vs 408
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 782
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 25 February 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 594 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops vs 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 792 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2943 vs 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 vs 408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 vs 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4250
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | ATI Radeon HD 4250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2943 | 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8818 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | ATI Radeon HD 4250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | RV620 |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 25 February 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | |
Place in performance rating | 803 | 800 |
Price now | $289.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 594 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops | 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s | 2.376 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 792 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.34 GB / s | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management | ||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |