NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 601 MHz
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2941 vs 2779
  • Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 580 vs 355
  • Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8814 vs 5107
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 vs 24.713
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 vs 2.189
  • Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 vs 68.712
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 January 2015 vs 7 August 2012
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 601 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2941 vs 2779
PassMark - G2D Mark 580 vs 355
Geekbench - OpenCL 8814 vs 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.949 vs 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.629 vs 2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 117.722 vs 68.712

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

  • Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 67.31 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
  • 2.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 512
  • Around 40% better floating-point performance: 1,615 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 685.1 vs 466.139
  • Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.929 vs 25.411
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 4080
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1721
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3288
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 4080
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1721
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3288
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 67.31 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1344 vs 512
Floating-point performance 1,615 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 685.1 vs 466.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.929 vs 25.411
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4825 vs 4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3712 vs 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4825 vs 4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3712 vs 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3288

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2941
2779
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
580
355
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8814
5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.949
24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
466.139
685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.629
2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25.411
28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
117.722
68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4080
4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1721
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3288
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4080
4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1721
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3288
3353
Name NVIDIA Quadro K1200 NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2941 2779
PassMark - G2D Mark 580 355
Geekbench - OpenCL 8814 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.949 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 466.139 685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.629 2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.411 28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 117.722 68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4080 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1721 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3288 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4080 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1721 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3288 3353

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK104
Launch date 28 January 2015 7 August 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $321.97 $329.99
Place in performance rating 802 805
Price now $289.99 $391
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 13.00 8.47

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1058 MHz 601 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,151 gflops 1,615 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 512 1344
Texture fill rate 35.97 GTexel / s 67.31 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Width 1" (2.5 cm)
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 3000 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management