NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 601 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2941 vs 2779
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 580 vs 355
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8814 vs 5107
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 vs 24.713
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 vs 2.189
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 vs 68.712
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 7 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 601 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2941 vs 2779 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 580 vs 355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8814 vs 5107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 vs 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 vs 2.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 vs 68.712 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 67.31 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 512
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 1,615 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 685.1 vs 466.139
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.929 vs 25.411
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 4080
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1721
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3288
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 4080
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1721
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3288
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 67.31 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,615 gflops vs 1,151 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 685.1 vs 466.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.929 vs 25.411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4825 vs 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4825 vs 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3288 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2941 | 2779 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 580 | 355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8814 | 5107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | 685.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | 2.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | 28.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | 68.712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 4825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 4825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 7 August 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | $329.99 |
Place in performance rating | 802 | 805 |
Price now | $289.99 | $391 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | 8.47 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 601 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s | 67.31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | No outputs |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |