AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA Quadro K1200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 640

NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 1058 MHz
Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz
1083.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1769 vs 1721
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1769 vs 1721
Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11459 vs 8821

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 28 January 2015
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 1058 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769 vs 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769 vs 1721
Geekbench - OpenCL	11459 vs 8821

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 2775
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 2775
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 3278
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 3278
Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 vs 352
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2948 vs 2116

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3288 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3288 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4080 vs 3278
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4080 vs 3278
PassMark - G2D Mark	579 vs 352
PassMark - G3D Mark	2948 vs 2116

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1200

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

1721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

1721

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3288

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

3288

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4080

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4080

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11459

8821

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

352

579

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2116

2948

Name	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769	1721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769	1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775	3288
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775	3288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278	4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278	4080
Geekbench - OpenCL	11459	8821
PassMark - G2D Mark	352	579
PassMark - G3D Mark	2116	2948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		31.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		466.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		25.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		117.722

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Arctic Islands	GM107
Launch date	13 May 2019	28 January 2015
Place in performance rating	802	804
Launch price (MSRP)		$321.97
Price now		$289.99
Type		Workstation
Value for money (0-100)		13.00
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1124 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	1058 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	512
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	35.97 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,151 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)	160 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	Dual-slot	1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management