NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 35.97 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2952 vs 830
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 vs 253
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8820 vs 2902
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 vs 10.872
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 vs 166.832
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 vs 0.817
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.411 vs 12.415
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 vs 36.916
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 1951
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 vs 1693
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 1951
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 vs 1693
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 18 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 vs 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 vs 1693 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 3288
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 3288
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 3288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 3288 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF108 |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 18 June 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | $59.99 |
Place in performance rating | 798 | 1311 |
Price now | $289.99 | $54.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | 20.48 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |