NVIDIA Quadro K1200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 35.97 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 66% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,151 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2952 versus 830
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 versus 253
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8820 versus 2902
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 versus 10.872
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 versus 166.832
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 versus 0.817
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.411 versus 12.415
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 versus 36.916
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 versus 1951
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 versus 1693
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 versus 1951
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 versus 1693
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 January 2015 versus 18 June 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.97 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,151 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 versus 1693 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 3288
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 3288
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 3288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 3288 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Nom de code | GM107 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 28 January 2015 | 18 June 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $321.97 | $59.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 798 | 1311 |
Prix maintenant | $289.99 | $54.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.00 | 20.48 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,151 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.97 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |