NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 35.97 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2952 vs 685
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 vs 286
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8820 vs 1699
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 vs 6.809
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 vs 111.269
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 vs 0.399
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.411 vs 7.769
- 12.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 vs 9.522
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 1211
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 vs 976
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 1720
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 1211
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 vs 976
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 1720
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 23 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 vs 685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 vs 286 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 vs 1699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 vs 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 vs 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 vs 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 vs 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 vs 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 vs 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 vs 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 vs 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 vs 1720 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | 685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 286 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 | 1699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | 0.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | 7.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 1720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK107 |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 23 October 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | $449 |
Place in performance rating | 798 | 1450 |
Price now | $289.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 160 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | DDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |