NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • 2.8x more texture fill rate: 35.97 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
  • 3.8x better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
  • 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2952 vs 685
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 vs 286
  • 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8820 vs 1699
  • 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.949 vs 6.809
  • 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 vs 111.269
  • 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.629 vs 0.399
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.411 vs 7.769
  • 12.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 vs 9.522
  • 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 1211
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 vs 976
  • Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 1720
  • 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 1211
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 vs 976
  • Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 1720
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 January 2015 vs 23 October 2012
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 797 MHz
Texture fill rate 35.97 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 192
Floating-point performance 1,151 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2952 vs 685
PassMark - G2D Mark 578 vs 286
Geekbench - OpenCL 8820 vs 1699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.949 vs 6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 466.139 vs 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.629 vs 0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.411 vs 7.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 117.722 vs 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4080 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1721 vs 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3288 vs 1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4080 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1721 vs 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3288 vs 1720

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

  • Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 45 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2952
685
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
578
286
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8820
1699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.949
6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
466.139
111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.629
0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25.411
7.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
117.722
9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4080
1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1721
976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3288
1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4080
1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1721
976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3288
1720
Name NVIDIA Quadro K1200 NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark 2952 685
PassMark - G2D Mark 578 286
Geekbench - OpenCL 8820 1699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.949 6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 466.139 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.629 0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.411 7.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 117.722 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4080 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1721 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3288 1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4080 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1721 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3288 1720

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 NVIDIA NVS 510

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK107
Launch date 28 January 2015 23 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $321.97 $449
Place in performance rating 798 1450
Price now $289.99
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 13.00

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1058 MHz 797 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,151 gflops 306.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 512 192
Texture fill rate 35.97 GTexel / s 12.75 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP 4x mini-DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 160 mm 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 1782 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit DDR3
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB / s

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management