NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1046 MHz
- Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 vs 548
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 vs 1577
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 1671
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 vs 1577
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 1671
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 1046 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 68 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 vs 548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 vs 1671 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 2952
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 8820
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 31.949
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 466.139
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 2.629
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 vs 25.411
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 117.722
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 4080
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 4080
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 1,151 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 vs 2952 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 vs 8820 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 vs 31.949 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 vs 466.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 vs 2.629 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 vs 25.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 vs 117.722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 vs 4080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 vs 4080 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | 3572 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 548 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 | 12020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | 40.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | 3.205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | 30.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | 166.26 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 1671 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | $395.75 |
| Place in performance rating | 798 | 787 |
| Price now | $289.99 | $343.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | 13.01 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 68 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 160 mm | 202 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||

