NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 vs 3971
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.093 vs 1.018
Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.219 vs 31.155

Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	4071 vs 3971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.332 vs 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.093 vs 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	38.219 vs 31.155

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1591 vs 1578
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 385
Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 386.006 vs 265.424
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.605 vs 15.009
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 vs 2446
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 1631
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1974
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 vs 2446
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 1631
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1974

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1591 vs 1578
PassMark - G2D Mark	407 vs 385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	386.006 vs 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.605 vs 15.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2646 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3493 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2646 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3493 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339 vs 1974

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1578

1591

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

385

407

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4071

3971

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.332

14.283

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

265.424

386.006

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.093

1.018

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.009

15.605

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.219

31.155

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2446

2646

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3493

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1974

3339

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2446

2646

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3493

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1974

3339

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2000	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark	1578	1591
PassMark - G2D Mark	385	407
Geekbench - OpenCL	4071	3971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.332	14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	265.424	386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.093	1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.009	15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	38.219	31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2446	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1631	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1974	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2446	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1631	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1974	3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2000	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK107
Launch date	1 March 2013	1 March 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$599
Place in performance rating	1206	969
Price now	$164.99	$464
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	11.74	4.14
Technical info
Core clock speed	954 MHz	954 MHz
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	732.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Texture fill rate	30.53 GTexel / s	30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt	51 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	202 mm	202 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5