NVIDIA Quadro K2000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 versus 3971
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.093 versus 1.018
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.219 versus 31.155
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4071 versus 3971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 versus 14.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 versus 1.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.219 versus 31.155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1591 versus 1578
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 versus 385
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 386.006 versus 265.424
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.605 versus 15.009
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 versus 2446
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 versus 1631
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 1974
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 versus 2446
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 versus 1631
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 1974
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 versus 1578 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 versus 385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 versus 265.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.605 versus 15.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 versus 2446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 versus 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 versus 2446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 versus 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 1974 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1578 | 1591 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 407 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4071 | 3971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 | 14.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 265.424 | 386.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 | 1.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.009 | 15.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.219 | 31.155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2446 | 2646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 | 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1974 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2446 | 2646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 | 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1974 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK107 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 | 1 March 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1206 | 969 |
Prix maintenant | $164.99 | $464 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.74 | 4.14 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 732.7 gflops | 732.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.53 GTexel / s | 30.53 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 51 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 202 mm | 202 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |