NVIDIA Quadro K2000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000

  • Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 versus 3971
  • Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.093 versus 1.018
  • Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.219 versus 31.155
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL 4071 versus 3971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.332 versus 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.093 versus 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 38.219 versus 31.155

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

  • Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1591 versus 1578
  • Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 versus 385
  • Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 386.006 versus 265.424
  • Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.605 versus 15.009
  • Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 versus 2446
  • 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 versus 1631
  • Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 1974
  • Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 versus 2446
  • 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 versus 1631
  • Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 1974
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 1591 versus 1578
PassMark - G2D Mark 407 versus 385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 386.006 versus 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.605 versus 15.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2646 versus 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3493 versus 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 versus 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2646 versus 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3493 versus 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 versus 1974

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1578
1591
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
385
407
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4071
3971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.332
14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
265.424
386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.093
1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.009
15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
38.219
31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2446
2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1974
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2446
2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1974
3339
Nom NVIDIA Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark 1578 1591
PassMark - G2D Mark 385 407
Geekbench - OpenCL 4071 3971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.332 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 265.424 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.093 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.009 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 38.219 31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2446 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1631 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1974 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2446 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1631 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1974 3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Comparer les caractéristiques

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Essentiel

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Nom de code GK107 GK107
Date de sortie 1 March 2013 1 March 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP) $599 $599
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1206 969
Prix maintenant $164.99 $464
Genre Workstation Workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) 11.74 4.14

Infos techniques

Vitesse du noyau 954 MHz 954 MHz
Performance á point flottant 732.7 gflops 732.7 gflops
Processus de fabrication 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Taux de remplissage de la texture 30.53 GTexel / s 30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt 51 Watt
Compte de transistor 1,270 million 1,270 million

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur 202 mm 202 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires None None

Soutien API

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Mémoire

RAM maximale 2 GB 2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire 64 GB / s 64 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire 128 Bit 128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire 4000 MHz 4000 MHz
Genre de mémoire GDDR5 GDDR5