NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs ATI Radeon HD 5730

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and ATI Radeon HD 5730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 64 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 2484
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 2484

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5730

• Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5730

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3493 2484
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3493 2484
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 3345

Compare specifications (specs)