NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 425 MHz
- 18x more texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 44.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1586 vs 36
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 178
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 1 April 2004 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 425 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1586 vs 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 vs 178 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1586 | 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 | 178 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.605 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.155 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Rankine |
Code name | GK107 | NV36 A1 |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 1 April 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $169.75 |
Place in performance rating | 979 | 977 |
Price now | $464 | $101.25 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.14 | 0.44 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | 1.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 82 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |