NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs AMD FirePro V4900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1586 vs 990
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 312
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3973 vs 1928
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.283 vs 6.303
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.018 vs 0.597
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 vs 1747
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 vs 1747

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 392.237 vs 386.006
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.874 vs 15.605
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 31.155
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3493
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3339
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3493
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3339

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1586 990
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	406 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3973 1928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.283 6.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	386.006 392.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.018 0.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.605 17.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.155 72.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2646 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3493 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 7745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2646 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3493 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3339 7745

Compare specifications (specs)