NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 7.5 GTexel / s
- 28.8x more pipelines: 576 vs 20
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 3008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1359 vs 176
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 285 vs 254
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 916
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 916
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 18 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 GTexel / s vs 7.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 576 vs 20 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3008 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1359 vs 176 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 285 vs 254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 916 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 55 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1359 | 176 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 285 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4570 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 916 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
Code name | GK106 | G71 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 18 April 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $84.95 | |
Place in performance rating | 1116 | 1119 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 GTexel / s | 7.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 278 million |
Boost clock speed | 375 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 500 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |