NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 954 MHz
Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
Around 96% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 1578
Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 385
3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 4071
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 14.332
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 265.424
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 1.093
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 vs 15.009
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 38.219
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 2446
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 2446

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 1 March 2013
Core clock speed	1046 MHz vs 954 MHz
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572 vs 1578
PassMark - G2D Mark	548 vs 385
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 vs 4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695 vs 14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094 vs 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205 vs 1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455 vs 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26 vs 38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 vs 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 vs 2446

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 68 Watt
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1631 vs 1577
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1974 vs 1671
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1631 vs 1577
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1974 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt vs 68 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1631 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1974 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1631 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1974 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3572

1578

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

548

385

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12020

4071

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.695

14.332

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

588.094

265.424

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.205

1.093

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.455

15.009

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

166.26

38.219

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

2446

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

1631

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

1974

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

2446

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

1631

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

1974

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K2000
PassMark - G3D Mark	3572	1578
PassMark - G2D Mark	548	385
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020	4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695	14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094	265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205	1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455	15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	166.26	38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921	2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1577	1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1671	1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921	2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1577	1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1671	1974
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK107
Launch date	22 July 2014	1 March 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	$599
Place in performance rating	787	1206
Price now	$343.99	$164.99
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	13.01	11.74
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	954 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	732.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	384
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s	30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt	51 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	202 mm	202 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5