NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce G205M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA GeForce G205M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 654 MHz vs 450 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 17.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1639 vs 92
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 294
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 989
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 989

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G205M

• 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G205M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 92
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	338 294
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 989
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 989

Compare specifications (specs)