NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 3.9x more texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 17.28 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 1152 vs 144
  • 3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 414.7 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 vs 1105
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 328 vs 325
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8855 vs 3673
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.487 vs 10.32
  • Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 vs 306.536
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 vs 0.883
  • Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.452 vs 18.564
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.984 vs 35.369
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 14 May 2011
Texture fill rate 67.78 GTexel / s vs 17.28 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1152 vs 144
Floating-point performance 1,627 gflops vs 414.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2756 vs 1105
PassMark - G2D Mark 328 vs 325
Geekbench - OpenCL 8855 vs 3673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.487 vs 10.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 600.985 vs 306.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.281 vs 0.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.452 vs 18.564
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 61.984 vs 35.369

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545

  • Around 2% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 706 MHz
  • Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1893 vs 1105
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3323 vs 1974
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3246
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1893 vs 1105
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3323 vs 1974
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3246
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 720 MHz vs 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 70 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1893 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3323 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1893 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3323 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3246

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2756
1105
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
328
325
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8855
3673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.487
10.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
600.985
306.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.281
0.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
35.452
18.564
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
61.984
35.369
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1105
1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1974
3323
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3246
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1105
1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1974
3323
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3246
3356
Name NVIDIA Quadro K4100M NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
PassMark - G3D Mark 2756 1105
PassMark - G2D Mark 328 325
Geekbench - OpenCL 8855 3673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.487 10.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 600.985 306.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.281 0.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.452 18.564
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 61.984 35.369
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1105 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1974 3323
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3246 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1105 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1974 3323
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3246 3356

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M NVIDIA GeForce GT 545

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK104 GF116
Launch date 23 July 2013 14 May 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $1,499 $149
Place in performance rating 1084 1086
Price now $379.99 $55.59
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 9.50 26.90

Technical info

Core clock speed 706 MHz 720 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,627 gflops 414.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1152 144
Texture fill rate 67.78 GTexel / s 17.28 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 1,170 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB / s 38.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus