NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 17.28 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 1152 vs 144
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 414.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 vs 1105
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8787 vs 3673
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.487 vs 10.32
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 vs 306.536
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 vs 0.883
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.452 vs 18.564
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.984 vs 35.369
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 14 May 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s vs 17.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 144 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops vs 414.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 vs 1105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8787 vs 3673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 vs 10.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 vs 306.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 vs 0.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 vs 18.564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 vs 35.369 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1893 vs 1105
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3323 vs 1974
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3246
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1893 vs 1105
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3323 vs 1974
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3246
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3323 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3323 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3246 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 | 1105 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8787 | 3673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | 10.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | 306.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | 0.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | 18.564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 | 35.369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1105 | 1893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1105 | 1893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GF116 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 14 May 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | $149 |
Place in performance rating | 1084 | 1086 |
Price now | $379.99 | $55.59 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | 26.90 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 720 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 414.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 144 |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s | 17.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 70 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |