NVIDIA Quadro K4100M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K4100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 67.78 GTexel / s versus 17.28 GTexel / s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 144
- 3.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,627 gflops versus 414.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1536 MB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 versus 1105
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8807 versus 3673
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.487 versus 10.32
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 versus 306.536
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 versus 0.883
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.452 versus 18.564
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.984 versus 35.369
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 14 May 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.78 GTexel / s versus 17.28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 144 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,627 gflops versus 414.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 versus 1105 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8807 versus 3673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 versus 10.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 versus 306.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 versus 0.883 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 versus 18.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 versus 35.369 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 720 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1893 versus 1105
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3323 versus 1974
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3246
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1893 versus 1105
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3323 versus 1974
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3246
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 720 MHz versus 706 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 versus 1105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3323 versus 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 versus 1105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3323 versus 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3246 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 | 1105 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 325 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8807 | 3673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | 10.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | 306.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | 0.883 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | 18.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 | 35.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1105 | 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1105 | 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 14 May 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,499 | $149 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1084 | 1086 |
| Prix maintenant | $379.99 | $55.59 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.50 | 26.90 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,627 gflops | 414.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 144 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.78 GTexel / s | 17.28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 102.4 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K4100M avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750M
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
AMDRadeon R7 250E
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
