NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD FirePro W5100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
• Around 48% better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4340 vs 2978
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12321 vs 11724
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 4397
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 4397

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 771 MHz
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 108 Watt
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5400 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 498
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 vs 33.016
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 736.063
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 vs 2.73
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 31.588
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 70.194
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 3382
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3311
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 3382
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3311

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4340 2978
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	498 531
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12321 11724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.016 35.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	736.063 838.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.73 3.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.588 57.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.194 163.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6373 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3382 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3311 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6373 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3382 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3311 3356

Compare specifications (specs)