NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5000 and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 8% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 651 MHz
  • 2.2x more texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
  • 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
  • Around 63% better floating-point performance: 2,169 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 204 Watt
  • Around 59% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 3404 MHz
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3987 vs 3505
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 397
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 August 2012 vs 2 May 2012
Core clock speed 706 MHz vs 651 MHz
Texture fill rate 90.37 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 512
Floating-point performance 2,169 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 122 Watt vs 204 Watt
Memory clock speed 5400 MHz vs 3404 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3987 vs 3505
PassMark - G2D Mark 430 vs 397

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000

  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.699 vs 31.318
  • Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 vs 681.141
  • Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 vs 3.062
  • Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.693 vs 32.922
  • Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 110.277 vs 67.311
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3680
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3680
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 32.699 vs 31.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1142.156 vs 681.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.796 vs 3.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.693 vs 32.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 110.277 vs 67.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3987
3505
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
430
397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.318
32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
681.141
1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.062
3.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
32.922
51.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
67.311
110.277
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3680
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3680
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3353
Name NVIDIA Quadro K5000 NVIDIA Quadro 7000
PassMark - G3D Mark 3987 3505
PassMark - G2D Mark 430 397
Geekbench - OpenCL 11376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.318 32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 681.141 1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.062 3.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 32.922 51.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.311 110.277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3680 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3680 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1351

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK104 GF110
Launch date 17 August 2012 2 May 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499 $14,499
Place in performance rating 697 698
Price now $1,950
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 2.47

Technical info

Core clock speed 706 MHz 651 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,169 gflops 1,332 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1536 512
Texture fill rate 90.37 GTexel / s 41.66 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 122 Watt 204 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 3,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 172.8 GB / s 177.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5400 MHz 3404 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5