AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 706 MHz
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 122 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 17 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2,169 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 433 vs 370
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3998 vs 1076
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11457 vs 5903
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 3341
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 3341
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 433 vs 370 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3998 vs 1076 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11457 vs 5903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 vs 3341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 433 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1076 | 3998 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5903 | 11457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Oland | GK104 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 17 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 703 | 706 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,950 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |