NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs AMD Radeon HD 7790
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and AMD Radeon HD 7790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2012 vs 988
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2012 vs 988
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 2061
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 2061
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 22 March 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 vs 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 vs 2061 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7790
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 846 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 896 vs 192
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 vs 641
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 vs 441
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 vs 1087
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 vs 1087
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 846 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 vs 641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 vs 1087 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7790
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | AMD Radeon HD 7790 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 641 | 3090 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 5087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 5087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 | 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 | 2061 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K510M | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GK208 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 22 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 823 | 824 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $134.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.57 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 846 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | 56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 1270 Million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |