NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 778 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
5.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 160 Watt
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 422

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 24 September 2011
Core clock speed	846 MHz vs 778 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 160 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	441 vs 422

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

3.2x more texture fill rate: 43.6 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 336 vs 192
3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,045.6 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1866 vs 641
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3537 vs 1087
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3537 vs 1087
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3398 vs 2012
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3398 vs 2012
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3117 vs 3071
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3117 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	43.6 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	336 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,045.6 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1866 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3537 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3537 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3398 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3398 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3117 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3117 vs 3071

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

641

1866

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

441

422

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

3537

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

3537

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3398

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3398

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3117

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3117

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
PassMark - G3D Mark	641	1866
PassMark - G2D Mark	441	422
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1087	3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1087	3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2012	3398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2012	3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3071	3117
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3071	3117
Geekbench - OpenCL		7872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		22.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		781.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		47.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		75.212

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK208	GF114
Launch date	23 July 2013	24 September 2011
Place in performance rating	820	822
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$199
Price now		$199.99
Value for money (0-100)		15.01
Technical info
Core clock speed	846 MHz	778 MHz
Floating-point performance	324.9 gflops	1,045.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	336
Texture fill rate	13.54 GTexel / s	43.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	160 Watt
Transistor count	1270 Million	1,950 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		210 mm
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB / s	96.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz	4008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus