NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K600 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 71% higher pipelines: 192 vs 112
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 336.4 gflops vs 280 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 728 vs 454
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 278 vs 89

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

• 2x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 14.02 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	728 454
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	278 89

Compare specifications (specs)