NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K610M and NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 240 MHz
- 8.2x more texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 1.92 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 239.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 718 vs 3
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 116
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 1 October 2001 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s vs 1.92 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 718 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 718 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 116 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kelvin |
Code name | GK208 | NV20 A5 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 1 October 2001 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229.99 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 1296 | 1294 |
Price now | $75 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 240 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 376.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 1.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1270 Million | 57 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 20.8 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |