NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 720 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2225 vs 435
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 263
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1962
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2332
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1962
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2332
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 23 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2225 vs 435 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2332 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 41 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2225 | 435 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | 263 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 2332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 2332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GM107 | Scrapper |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 961 | 964 |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 720 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | No outputs |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |