NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 720 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 435
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 263
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1962
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2332
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1962
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 435 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2332 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 41 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 435 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 263 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 2332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 2332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD Radeon HD 8410G IGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | GM107 | Scrapper |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
| Place in performance rating | 953 | 954 |
| Price now | $189.93 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | No outputs |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K620 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
NVIDIATesla K10
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
NVIDIATesla K20c
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8410G IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
NVIDIAQuadro K620 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
