NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 706 MHz
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- 8.2x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 6.5x more pipelines: 2496 vs 384
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 vs 6869
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 vs 22.112
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 297.631
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 vs 1.427
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 15.363
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 vs 99.125
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 vs 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 vs 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 vs 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 vs 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 vs 99.125 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2233 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 15597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 39.423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 1427.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 4.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 64.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 179.044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK110 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 12 November 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | $3,199 |
Place in performance rating | 974 | 976 |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2496 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 146.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | No outputs |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |