NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 753 MHz
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 384 vs 144
  • 2.2x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 388.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 654
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 111
  • Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 vs 2859
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 7.699
  • 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 21.909
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 1134
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 1134
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 March 2015 vs 27 October 2011
Boost clock speed 1124 MHz vs 753 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 144
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 388.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1165 vs 654
PassMark - G2D Mark 158 vs 111
Geekbench - OpenCL 4583 vs 2859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.872 vs 7.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.813 vs 21.909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1291 vs 1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1291 vs 1134

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 165.904
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 927
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 1349
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 927
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 1349
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 252.895 vs 165.904
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2265 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2827 vs 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2265 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2827 vs 1349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1165
654
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
158
111
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4583
2859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
23.872
7.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
165.904
252.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
91.813
21.909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1291
1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
927
2265
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1349
2827
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1291
1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
927
2265
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1349
2827
Name NVIDIA Quadro K620M NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1165 654
PassMark - G2D Mark 158 111
Geekbench - OpenCL 4583 2859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.872 7.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 165.904 252.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.813 21.909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1291 1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 927 2265
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1349 2827
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1291 1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 927 2265
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1349 2827
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.581

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K620M NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Fermi
Code name GM108 GF106
Launch date 1 March 2015 27 October 2011
Place in performance rating 1428 1430
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz 753 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 388.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 144
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt
CUDA cores Up to 144
Transistor count 1,170 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3\DDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
SLI