NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 753 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 384 vs 144
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 388.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 654
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 111
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 vs 2859
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 7.699
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 21.909
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 1134
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 1134
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 vs 27 October 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 753 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 144 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 388.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 vs 654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 vs 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 vs 2859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 vs 7.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 vs 21.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 vs 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 vs 1134 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 165.904
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 927
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 1349
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 927
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 1349
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 vs 165.904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 vs 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 vs 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 vs 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 vs 1349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | 654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 | 2859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | 7.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | 252.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | 21.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | 2827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | 2827 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM108 | GF106 |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 | 27 October 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1428 | 1430 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 753 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 388.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 144 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3\DDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |