NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 692
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 vs 1706
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 6.809
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 165.904 vs 111.269
- 9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 9.522
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 1211
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 1211
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 vs 23 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 vs 692 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 vs 1706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 vs 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 vs 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 vs 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 vs 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 vs 1211 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 158
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 927
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1349
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 927
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1349
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 vs 158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 vs 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 vs 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 vs 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 vs 1349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | 692 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4583 | 1706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | 6.809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | 111.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | 9.522 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | 1720 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK107 |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 | 23 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1429 | 1430 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 306.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 160 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |