NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA NVS 510

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • 2.8x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
  • Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 692
  • 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 vs 1706
  • 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 6.809
  • Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 165.904 vs 111.269
  • 9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 9.522
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 1211
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 1211
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 March 2015 vs 23 October 2012
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 797 MHz
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1165 vs 692
Geekbench - OpenCL 4583 vs 1706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.872 vs 6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 165.904 vs 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.813 vs 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1291 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1291 vs 1211

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 158
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 927
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1349
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 927
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1349
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 288 vs 158
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 976 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1720 vs 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 976 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1720 vs 1349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1165
692
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
158
288
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4583
1706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
23.872
6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
165.904
111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
91.813
9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1291
1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
927
976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1349
1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1291
1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
927
976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1349
1720
Name NVIDIA Quadro K620M NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark 1165 692
PassMark - G2D Mark 158 288
Geekbench - OpenCL 4583 1706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.872 6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 165.904 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.813 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1291 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 927 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1349 1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1291 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 927 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1349 1720
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.769

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K620M NVIDIA NVS 510

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM108 GK107
Launch date 1 March 2015 23 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1429 1430
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $449

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 797 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 306.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 192
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 12.75 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 160 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 28.51 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1782 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
nView Display Management
Optimus