NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA NVS 510

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA NVS 510

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 797 MHz
Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
2.8x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 697
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 vs 1709
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 6.809
Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 165.904 vs 111.269
9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 9.522
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 1211
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 1211

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 March 2015 vs 23 October 2012
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 797 MHz
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1165 vs 697
Geekbench - OpenCL	4583 vs 1709
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.872 vs 6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	165.904 vs 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	91.813 vs 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1291 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1291 vs 1211

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 158
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 927
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1349
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 927
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1349

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	288 vs 158
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	976 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1720 vs 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	976 vs 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1720 vs 1349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1165

697

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

158

288

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4583

1709

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.872

6.809

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

165.904

111.269

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

91.813

9.522

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1291

1211

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

927

976

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1349

1720

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1291

1211

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

927

976

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1349

1720

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K620M	NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark	1165	697
PassMark - G2D Mark	158	288
Geekbench - OpenCL	4583	1709
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.872	6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	165.904	111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	91.813	9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1291	1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	927	976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1349	1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1291	1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	927	976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1349	1720
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		7.769

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K620M	NVIDIA NVS 510
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM108	GK107
Launch date	1 March 2015	23 October 2012
Place in performance rating	1428	1429
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$449
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	797 MHz
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	306.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s	12.75 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count		1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		160 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	28.51 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
nView Display Management
Optimus