NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 49% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 667 MHz
Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 55 Watt
Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3008 MHz
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2879 vs 1356
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 281
Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 4460
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 12.383
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 358.892
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 1.107
Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 21.761
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 40.703
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 2294
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3605
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 2294
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3605

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 667 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 55 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 3008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2879 vs 1356
PassMark - G2D Mark	312 vs 281
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849 vs 4460
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 vs 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18 vs 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938 vs 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3605

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Around 13% higher pipelines: 576 vs 512
1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	32.02 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	576 vs 512
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2879

1356

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

312

281

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

4460

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.33

12.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

721.18

358.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.056

1.107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.938

21.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.786

40.703

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3362

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2879	1356
PassMark - G2D Mark	312	281
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	4460
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33	12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18	358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056	1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938	21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786	40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK106
Launch date	18 August 2015	23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	$84.95
Place in performance rating	832	1105
Price now	$203.37	$159.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	16.10	10.91
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	667 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	768.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	576
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	32.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	2,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	48.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus