NVIDIA Quadro M1000M versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
Environ 49% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 667 MHz
Environ 32% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,017 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
Environ 38% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 55 Watt
Environ 67% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 3008 MHz
2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2874 versus 1357
Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 313 versus 280
Environ 98% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 versus 4472
3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 versus 12.383
2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 versus 358.892
2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 versus 1.107
Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 versus 21.761
3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 versus 40.703
Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 versus 2294
Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3605
Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 versus 2294
Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3605

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	18 August 2015 versus 23 July 2013
Vitesse du noyau	993 MHz versus 667 MHz
Performance á point flottant	1,017 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt versus 55 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz versus 3008 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2874 versus 1357
PassMark - G2D Mark	313 versus 280
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849 versus 4472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 versus 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18 versus 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 versus 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938 versus 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 versus 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 versus 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 versus 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 versus 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 versus 3605

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 32.02 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 512
1024x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	32.02 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	576 versus 512
Taille de mémore maximale	2 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 versus 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 versus 3358

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2874

1357

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

313

280

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

4472

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.33

12.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

721.18

358.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.056

1.107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.938

21.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.786

40.703

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3362

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2874	1357
PassMark - G2D Mark	313	280
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	4472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33	12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18	358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056	1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938	21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786	40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Nom de code	GM107	GK106
Date de sortie	18 August 2015	23 July 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$200.89	$84.95
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	832	1105
Prix maintenant	$203.37	$159.99
Genre	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	16.10	10.91
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1072 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	993 MHz	667 MHz
Performance á point flottant	1,017 gflops	768.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	576
Taux de remplissage de la texture	31.78 GTexel / s	32.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	55 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,870 million	2,540 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Taille du laptop	large	medium sized
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0	5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB / 4 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	80 GB / s	48.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz	3008 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus